Luceafara (luceafara) wrote in menstrual_cups,
Luceafara
luceafara
menstrual_cups

Eco, Mami, Ruby and comparison pics

I think I'm in love. I just got a few more cups in the mail today, and thought I'd post pictures and a quick description of the Eco-cups (size 1 and 2), Mamicup and Ruby cup (the others have been written about).
The Eco-cups, even the size 2, are almost as long over-all as the Si-bell/Natu (that's a Natu in the pics, but it really looks the same), but the cups themselves are so short that low cervix people can wear them easily.

Eco-cup:
-The large (E2) about one point, the small (E1) about two points firmer than the Fleurcup
-5 slanted holes - hole diameter very small
- very smooth lines and no visible side seam

CAPACITY TO HOLES LENGTH CUP + STEM DIAMETER
SIZE 1 17 ml 45 mm 22 mm 42.5 mm
SIZE 2 20 ml 45 mm 22 mm 46 mm

Rubycup:
-About one pt firmer than small Fleucup
-4 small holes that sit very low
-very smooth - I can see the sidseam when held against light

M Mamicup:
-4 small holes
-shape and size very close to S Fleurcup
-inside feels different from peachskin outside
-outside has many grippy textures that may be an issue if you are sensitive
-a tiny bit softer than S Fleurcup

Let me know if you have any questions.


E1/2:Eco-cup, F:S Fleurcup, M: M Mami, R:Ruby, Sc/Sk:S Sckoon, Si/Na: S Si-bell/Natu

Tags: brand comparisons, diagrams & pictures, fleurcup, mami cup, natu, ruby cup, sckoon
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for members only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 12 comments