Log in

No account? Create an account
29 July 2013 @ 12:36 pm
Not much has been written about the Natu cup, so here goes:

I happened to find a good price for a Natu, and ordered one in size 1, though I already have more than enough cups. In some pictures, the Natu looked different from the Si-bell, in others the same.

Anyhow, for all those who always wondered, the Natu size 1 is almost identical to the small Si-bell. The only difference is that the walls are a bit thinner, the Natu cup therefore softer than the Si-bell.

In the below picture, you can clearly see more through the Natu (left) than the Si-bell (right).

Everything else is the same. Not sure how I could get the softness charts updated to reflect this, any ideas?

Update: I just realized that what I have is the OLD natu, the new one has the natu logo across one side and is a bit rounder in shape. Bummer - they sent me old stock.
(Deleted comment)
Luceafaraluceafara on July 30th, 2013 12:03 pm (UTC)
Yes, there is no noticeable difference in the way it opens.
Quitteriequitterie on September 4th, 2013 07:18 pm (UTC)
-I guess the holes are exactly the same too ?

-Oh, and do you feel (maybe) a tiny difference in the type of texture the surface of the cups have, like one of them is very slightly smoother than the other brand, or less 'downy'.. ?
In advance, thanks ;D

Luceafaraluceafara on September 4th, 2013 11:42 pm (UTC)
Yes, the holes, ridges on the side, etc. are exactly the same, and I personally find the texture on them exactly the same as well. It's only the thickness of the walls and thus the overall softness and flexibility of the cup that is a bit different.
Quitteriequitterie on September 4th, 2013 07:20 pm (UTC)
Ah ! = ;)
.. And would they have the same smell ?